A proposed U.S. bill that seeks to impose a 5% excise tax on money transfers sent abroad by non-citizens is raising alarm among immigrant communities, particularly Indian nationals living and working in the United States. If enacted, the measure would place new financial burdens on millions of foreign workers, students, and even legal permanent residents who regularly send money to support families overseas.
The proposed tax, outlined in a Republican-backed bill dubbed the “BEAUTIFUL Act,” targets international remittances made from the United States to other countries. The legislation has reignited debates over immigration policy, fairness in taxation, and the potential impact on America’s relationship with countries like India.
Indian Workers Among Most Affected
India is one of the top three source countries of immigrants to the United States. According to recent data, nearly 2.3 million Indians reside in the U.S. under a variety of visa programs, including H-1B work visas, F-1 student visas, and permanent residency. These individuals represent a major share of remittances sent back to India. In 2023 alone, Indian nationals in the U.S. transferred over $23 billion to recipients in India.
Under the proposed law, these remittances would now be subject to a 5% excise tax, significantly affecting both senders and recipients. For example, a family sending $1,000 per month to relatives in India would either need to pay an additional $50 in taxes or reduce the amount sent to $950 to stay within budget.
The tax would apply broadly, not only to visa holders and permanent residents but also to non-residents earning income in the U.S. through investment gains or stock options. This includes many Indians working in the tech sector who receive restricted stock units (RSUs) as part of their compensation packages. When these shares vest and are sold, proceeds often support family obligations or investment in India—and under the proposed bill, such transfers would incur the 5% tax even though the income has already been taxed once.
Legal Experts Warn of Disproportionate Impact
Tax professionals and legal analysts say the bill, if passed, would mark a significant shift in U.S. tax policy and disproportionately affect foreign workers who contribute to the economy on par with citizens.
“This proposed tax clearly targets non-citizens, many of whom are vital contributors to the U.S. workforce,” said Akhilesh Ranjan, a former member of India’s Central Board of Direct Taxes and current policy advisor at PwC India. “It is ironic that the U.S.—which once called India’s digital services tax discriminatory—is now introducing a remittance tax that singles out foreign nationals.”
Sandeep Jhunjhunwala, M&A tax partner at Nangia Andersen LLP, echoed these concerns. “The remittance tax proposal could have profound implications for non-resident Indians and other foreign nationals living in the U.S. It represents a fundamental change in tax treatment, especially for workers on visas or green cards,” he said.
Jhunjhunwala pointed out that the proposal exempts U.S. citizens and nationals from the tax, while placing the burden squarely on non-citizens. “Millions of legal immigrants may be forced to absorb this extra cost while continuing to support families in their home countries. The burden is not only financial—it’s systemic.”
Administrative and Compliance Issues
According to the bill’s text, the 5% excise tax would be collected by money transfer agencies and submitted to the U.S. Treasury on a quarterly basis. Ajay Rotti, founder of Tax Compass, noted that the legislation’s Section 112105 lays out detailed provisions for how the tax would be administered, including its exclusive application to non-citizens.
“The law explicitly calls for taxing international remittances from non-U.S. citizens, and mandates that registered money transmitters collect and remit the tax. This makes every outbound transaction from foreign workers more expensive,” Rotti said.
He also noted that, because the law applies to all international outbound remittances by non-citizens, it would likely affect students, professionals, retirees, and investors alike—potentially discouraging them from maintaining economic ties to their home countries.
Policy and Diplomatic Ramifications
The proposal has not yet been enacted and remains in the early stages of congressional consideration. Still, it has sparked a wave of concern in India and among immigrant advocacy groups in the United States. Some fear the tax could strain diplomatic ties between Washington and key allies such as New Delhi.
A senior Indian government official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the measure—if passed—would undermine bilateral tax agreements. “The U.S. Constitution allows Congress to override treaties, while India operates under a regime where the more favorable law prevails. If this tax becomes law, it would be seen as an unfriendly breach of tax reciprocity.”
Amarpar Chadha, Partner and Head of Global Mobility at Ernst & Young India, added that the proposed tax could force Indian workers in the U.S. to reconsider their remittance habits. “Many Indian nationals working in the U.S. regularly send money home for family support or investment purposes,” Chadha said. “This tax, if enacted, would create added pressure and might force them to reduce the frequency or size of those transfers.”
Political Context
The bill is supported primarily by Republican lawmakers and is seen as part of former President Donald Trump’s broader economic agenda, which emphasized restricting immigration and maximizing domestic tax collection. Supporters argue that the tax could raise revenue and deter money laundering, but critics see it as a punitive measure against legal immigrants.
Immigrant rights organizations and tax analysts alike have warned that the law could lead to unintended consequences, such as a rise in informal or unregulated transfer channels, and increased barriers for foreign professionals choosing to live and work in the U.S.
While the bill’s fate remains uncertain, its proposal has already sent ripples through immigrant communities who rely on transnational financial support. Many now face the prospect of higher costs simply for sending money home—something they’ve long done as a lifeline, not a luxury.
Related Topics:
