Personal statement plays a very important role in the preparation of overseas study application materials for doctoral students, which is the focus of the school’s review.
Today, I will bring you a personal statement for doctoral application.
First of all, I should introduce my research experience.
This is fundamental to being accepted as a postdoctoral researcher, and almost all candidates also know to talk about it, so it’s often not missed, it’s often talked about too much.
Because it’s a research experience, it should be broader, even starting with how much you loved science as a child (if any).
If your research is very continuous, such as from the beginning of your undergraduate dissertation, you might want to start there.
If you are only in graduate school when you really come into contact with scientific research, you can also start from this time.
Some candidates may do their master’s and doctoral studies separately, or their research content is not continuous. It is also useful to talk about the research work for the two degrees.
Of course, the discussion should not be carried out in the way of academic reports, let alone in the form of a running list. The main conclusions and their academic contributions should be clearly expressed, and at the same time, the scientific issues you study should be used throughout the presentation, and explain why you do this research.
It will go a long way to impress the interviewer if you include some “moving” stories about your love of scientific research and how hard it is to do it.
Get out of the graduate mindset and plan a post-doctoral research project.
A post-doc, not a second PhD.
During the doctoral study, the tutor is very important to supervise, and sometimes the student’s research even needs to be supervised by the tutor.
Postdoctoral tutors are generally referred to as cooperative tutors, which means that the relationship between the student and the tutor is more important than receiving guidance unilaterally.
If your supervisor is recruiting a postdoctoral fellow for a project, you should fully understand what your supervisor’s project will be and specify in the research proposal what problems you can solve for the project, either independently or in collaboration with your supervisor.
If your supervisor specifies that it is not a post-doctoral program, but a freelance research program, this is the time to take advantage.
If your supervisor is willing to recruit such a postdoctoral fellow, it shows that he values academic cooperation more. Even if your current work and expertise are completely different from your supervisor’s research direction, it is just related to some aspects.
Since mentors value collaboration, you need to know a lot about your mentor. Read and study the published work of your mentor and his or her team, and then clash with your own characteristics to see if you can spark a new spark.
If you can really collide with some sparks and get the recognition of the tutor, the post-doctoral two years will be relatively smooth, because it is a combination of strong and strong.
If your mentor doesn’t agree with your ideas, you don’t really know what your mentor does, and you need to work on it.
Of course, there are even some mentors who are willing to let you do things that you think are important, but that they don’t know about, and that can put a lot of pressure on you.
If you happen to be independent and confident in yourself, give yourself a chance, of course, to write a complete and workable work plan for the tutor to judge from the perspective of scientific appreciation.
This research proposal needs to be fully communicated and prepared with the supervisor before the interview, and should be presented as a key point during the interview.
Unfortunately, most post-doctoral candidates ignore this aspect and write it down in such a way that it comes across as unreliable or even questionable.
A final point, for reference, is to take care to provide some supporting information and background.
Postdoctoral RESEARCHER IS A STUDENT NO LONGER, IT IS THE COUNTRY OFFICIAL STAFF MEMBER THAT HAS DEADLINE, SHOULD CALCULATE LENGTH OF SERVICE LIKE OTHER OFFICIAL WORKER DURING POSTDOCTORAL RESEARCH, BESIDES ENJOY THE PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT THAT THE COUNTRY SETS OUTSIDE, STILL ENJOY ALL SORTS OF TREATMENT LIKE THIS UNIT OFFICIAL WORKER.
Therefore, post-doctoral recruitment is not quite the same as recruiting graduate students.
As a candidate, you should give a brief introduction to your supervisor and his/her research, which will help the interviewer analyze and evaluate your academic status.
If it is a fake mentor, it is best to introduce the actual mentor to show respect for the mentor.
It’s hard to get people to like you if you’re too shy to speak up even to your mentor.
Additional, WANT TO INTRODUCE ONESELF FAMILY CIRCUMSTANCE SIMPLY, FOR EXAMPLE MARRIAGE IS NOT, WHETHER HAVE A CHILD?
Where does your spouse work?
Do you have a lot of stress in your life?
Some candidates, especially female candidates, have struggled with whether to say they are married, fearing it might affect their admission.
Other candidates have decided to apply for a post-doctoral job in a city because their spouse or partner is in that city, and fear it will look bad to say so.
In fact, there is no need to consider such factors, these factors are completely understandable, do not sneaky, evasive.
If you get caught later because you didn’t tell the truth, it will probably hurt you even more.
On the other hand, if the organization really cares about the aboveboard reasons you can give, then the organization doesn’t have to go.
Otherwise, you may regret doing this postdoctoral program later.
Of course, if you have communicated fully with the co-advisor before, the family information can be ignored during the presentation.
Paragraph 1: ? The relationship between the recommender and the applicant.
? In what context and for how long the recommender has known the applicant.
? Which semester and department the applicant wishes to apply to.
Paragraph 2: ? Recommender’s assessment of the applicant’s eligibility.
? What particular impression did the recommender have of the applicant when they first met him or her?
? Provide examples to substantiate the recommender’s assessment of the applicant.
Paragraph 3: ? An assessment of the applicant’s personal characteristics.
Such as communication skills, maturity, ambition, leadership skills, teamwork skills, and integrity) or areas that need improvement.
Conclusion: ? The recommender’s overall assessment of the applicant.
? Assess the future personal and professional development of the applicant after completion of his/her studies.
? How the applicant will contribute to the department and community.
Signature of the Tutor Name of the Tutor (printed) Title and Company Name Email: Tel: Fax: Address:
