Spain’s recent decision to recognize a Palestinian state has stirred debate, particularly regarding the country’s historical context and its implications for justice.
Having recently visited Spain and Portugal to explore Jewish history, we encountered differing attitudes towards past injustices. While Portugal demonstrated sincere regret for its persecution of Jews, Spain’s approach felt performative, lacking genuine remorse for its notorious Inquisition.
The recognition of a Palestinian state by Spain, alongside two other European countries, prompts reflection on the motivations behind such a move. While Ireland’s identification with purportedly oppressed groups and Norway’s commitment to the two-state solution have understandable roots, Spain’s stance raises eyebrows.
Despite superficial apologies for the Inquisition and efforts to attract Jewish tourism, our firsthand experience revealed a different reality. Memorials to the Inquisition in Spain are discreet, and local guides often downplay its significance, suggesting a reluctance to confront the country’s dark past.
In contrast, Portugal openly acknowledges its history of persecution, with vivid memorials commemorating atrocities against Jews. The sincerity of Portuguese officials in acknowledging past wrongs contrasts sharply with Spain’s approach.
The connection between anti-Zionism and antisemitism is complex but cannot be ignored. While anti-Zionism theoretically differs from antisemitism, in practice, the two often intertwine. Attacks on Jews and the ostracism of those with ties to Israel highlight this troubling reality.
Spain’s support for a two-state solution may be portrayed as a pursuit of justice. However, its history of anti-Zionism, intertwined with faintly regretted antisemitism, raises doubts about the sincerity of its commitment to justice in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Related topics:
