During the first presidential debate on September 10, former President Donald Trump launched a sharp attack on the immigration policies of the Biden-Harris administration. The debate, hosted by ABC in Philadelphia, brought Vice President Kamala Harris and Trump face-to-face in what may be their only debate before the election. The immigration issue took center stage, with Trump accusing the current administration of mishandling the U.S. border and allowing criminals into the country.
Trump’s Bold Claims on Immigration
When asked how he plans to deport over 11 million undocumented immigrants, Trump responded by blaming the Biden-Harris administration for what he described as a massive failure in immigration policy. He stated, without presenting evidence, that the administration’s approach had allowed “terrorists,” “criminals,” and “drug dealers” to flood into the U.S. The former president went so far as to call it “one of the greatest mistakes in history.”
In his remarks, Trump suggested that crime rates in countries like Venezuela have dropped significantly because, in his view, these nations have offloaded their criminals to the U.S. through lax immigration policies. “They’ve taken their criminals off the street, and they’ve given them to [Kamala Harris] to put into our country,” Trump claimed. He further insisted that this situation had led to what he called a “migrant crime” crisis in the U.S., with crime rates “through the roof.”
Moderators Push Back on False Claims
Throughout the debate, moderators Linsey Davis and David Muir frequently challenged Trump’s statements, particularly his claims about crime statistics and the effects of immigration. Both Davis and Muir cited numerous instances where Trump’s assertions contradicted verified data on crime and immigration. For example, Trump’s claim that migrant crime is occurring at unprecedented levels has been widely debunked by experts and fact-checkers, who point to data showing that immigrants, including undocumented ones, are less likely to commit crimes than U.S.-born citizens.
Despite the pushback from the moderators, Trump remained firm in his stance, portraying immigration as a significant threat to national security. His approach reflects a broader strategy that he has used throughout his political career, tapping into fears about immigration and crime to rally support from his base.
Harris Defends the Administration’s Record
In response to Trump’s attacks, Vice President Kamala Harris defended the immigration policies of the Biden administration. Harris emphasized the administration’s focus on creating a more humane and orderly immigration system, pointing out the complexities of managing a border as large and active as the one between the U.S. and Mexico. She also underscored the efforts made to address the root causes of migration, such as economic instability and violence in Central America, which have led to a surge in migrants seeking refuge in the U.S.
“We inherited a broken system,” Harris said, referring to the state of the immigration system when Biden took office. “Our priority has been to create solutions that are not only tough but fair and compassionate. The American people deserve an immigration policy that reflects our values.”
Harris also pushed back on Trump’s claims about crime, stating that the administration is committed to keeping American communities safe while respecting the dignity and rights of those seeking asylum. “We are focused on ensuring security, but we’re doing it in a way that honors who we are as a nation,” she added.
Immigration: A Defining Issue of the Election
Immigration has long been a polarizing issue in U.S. politics, and it continues to be a central theme in the 2024 presidential race. Trump’s focus on immigration during the debate is a reflection of how crucial the topic remains to his platform, particularly as he seeks to galvanize support among conservative voters who prioritize strict border security.
The Biden-Harris administration has faced criticism from both sides of the political spectrum on its immigration policies. Progressives have expressed frustration over the continuation of some Trump-era policies, such as the use of Title 42, which allows for the expulsion of migrants during public health emergencies. On the other hand, conservatives argue that the administration has not done enough to curb illegal immigration and protect the southern border.
According to political analysts, the immigration debate could prove decisive in shaping the outcome of the 2024 election, especially in battleground states with significant immigrant populations. Candidates from both parties will likely continue to focus on this issue as they attempt to sway undecided voters and solidify their bases.
Polls Suggest Debate Impact on Voters
The debate between Trump and Harris attracted significant public attention, with a recent PBS News/NPR/Marist poll indicating that over two-thirds of Americans planned to watch all or most of the event. The poll also revealed that while many voters have already made up their minds about whom they will support in the election, around 14 percent of Americans believe that the debate could have a considerable impact on their decision.
For Trump, the debate provided a platform to double down on his campaign promises to “take back” the country from what he portrays as ineffective and dangerous leadership. His tough stance on immigration is seen as a key element of his strategy to energize his base, which remains deeply concerned about issues of national security and border control.
Looking Ahead: The Road to November
As the campaign progresses, immigration will remain one of the most hotly contested issues in the 2024 race. Trump’s rhetoric on the subject has already proven to be a powerful tool in shaping voter opinions, particularly among his loyal supporters. Meanwhile, Harris and the Biden administration will need to continue defending their record while addressing the concerns of both progressives and moderates who seek a balanced approach to immigration reform.
In the weeks leading up to the election, both campaigns are expected to ramp up their efforts to sway undecided voters. The immigration debate, in particular, may play a pivotal role in determining the final outcome, especially as the U.S. continues to grapple with challenges at the southern border and the broader question of how to handle undocumented immigrants already living in the country.
For voters in 2024, the immigration issue is more than just a political talking point—it is a reflection of the nation’s values, security, and identity. Whether Trump’s tough stance will resonate more than Harris’s defense of a more measured approach remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: immigration will continue to shape the political landscape well beyond this election.
Related topics:
